Wisdom. Word “wisdom” comes from latin “know”, where also comes from word “flavor”. Wisdom is the art of appreciating flavor. She shows a very concrete attitude, very real, and quite far from elaborate conceptual organization. It's about finding an art of living that let you taste the flavor of life .
How does this concept of wisdom relate to that, plus occidental, fromphilosophy ; because philosophy means “love of wisdom”. In ancient times philosophers were men who were expected to live by their philosophy that they taught. To philosophize involved a a way of life which harmonizes thought and life .
And then over the last few centuries, in West, philosophy has become the art of building systems of thought, to support them, to defend them and, in “legal problems”, discussions, to prove their supremacy over others. In classical China, one of homes of worldly wisdom, it was designed differently ; so we said that “the wise man is clueless, sans position, without necessity” .
I think a sage is a human being without particular quality, without a predetermined idea, without standing at defend, because he wants to remain open to reality, to be fresh and ready for what happens. It is through this posture that the sage can best reflect the one who confides in him. Wisdom is the opposite of wisdom. twitching. She is close to serenity .
The wise “believes” not ; he has the “he was” .
The “belief” comes from latin “to believe” and in this family of words we find in particular in French “credulity”, that is to say a way of giving one's adhesion to assertions that one is unable to rationally substantiate. Believe it is to adhere to certain affirmations .
The “he was” comes from latin “fides” and in the family of words derived from this root there are Latin “trust”, who gave “trust ” in French. A man of faith is not primarily a man who believes this or that, but a man inhabited from within by confidence. Have faith, is to trust in whatever ultimate reality. We can be inhabited by confidence and faith without really knowing what is the bottom of the bottom of the real .
Do not consider the “belief” as credulity, but as being of another order level of consciousness than the “he was .”
And on this way, we are always trying to to do the first step. When we take a step, we expose ourselves to a imbalance. We accept for a moment to lose the balance of stillness until a new equilibrium point is found, setting foot on the ground. When there's nothing more reassuring than standing still, advance one foot in front of the other, is to take the risk of tripping. It is accepting the known to go to the unknown, And this, without knowing in advance if this reserve joy and trial. To him who gets up and walks, will open before him a vast space, because depending on the course he sets – whether it is truth, reality or wisdom – the “true walker” can only go from beginning to beginning with beginnings that have no end.
The “true walker” is a man of this world. He cannot deviate from the commitment which at the turn of his life course will summon him to enter into a story, to subscribe to what has been done or not yet done before him and that he senses that it must be done. He will need to take part. He will have to incarnate to help transform the world.
The “true walker” also seems to out of the world. He is in himself, for himself, the object of its realization through an internal route. He is in direct contact with what is beyond him and inexorably advances towards the unnameable and the nameless. He gives and receives as of passing time and the encounters it makes without particularly lending pay attention to the consequences of their actions. It is“presence” to what is. He is in trust .
The “true walker” in search of his achievement must overcome the contradiction between“l’engagement” and“interiority” in order to be at gates of the temple where “wisdom” and “awareness” are at the both differentiated and reunited. At this point in his journey, by a reversal perspective driven by faith, it can exceed the level of reality beyond from which our logic no longer works. In effect, what in our world usual seems inappropriate, can appear on the contrary in consonance, when we change register, like a new level of reality .
There is no opposition between the search for interiority and engagement in the life of the world. One is almost condition for the other to be truly effective. The one who would stay almost always locked in on itself in a sort of bottomless quest end up drying out on the vine because it will lack food from the relationship with all the beings around him. And whoever would engage in transformation of the world without taking the time to return to its interiority deep, this one after a while will be able to scatter, crumble, to disperse, se chosifier .
136